A Tool Kit to Destroy Families
By Stephen Baskerville, PhD, Washington Times, Dec. 9, 2001, Commentary section (Forum, p. B5),
Amid the war against terrorism both abroad and at home, as we send our servicemen overseas to defend our homes and country, Attorney General John Ashcroft can apparently find time to undermine our heroes here on the home front by continuing federal action to destroy their families and children.
The Attorney General and Health Secretary Tommy Thompson have just announced the creation of a federal "Toolkit to End Violence Against Women." The Toolkit is a series of documents that rehash familiar but discredited hysteria about domestic violence and instruct mothers on how to use groundless accusations of domestic violence to end their marriages and remove children from their fathers. Like myriad existing government programs, this will do nothing to "end violence against women." What it will do is accelerate family destruction and increase violence against children.
|[T]he hysteria over domestic violence is
largely geared toward one aim: removing children from their fathers. Donna Laframboise of
the National Post investigated battered womens shelters in the US and Canada and
concluded they constituted "one stop divorce shops" whose primary purpose was
not to shelter abused women but to promote divorce. These shelters, many of which are
federally funded, issue affidavits against fathers sight-unseen that are accepted without
any corroborating evidence by judges eager (for their own bureaucratic reasons) to justify
restraining orders against fathers and the removal of their children.
- Stephen Baskerville
Consider three long-established and undisputed facts:
A British study found children are up to 33 times more likely to be abused when a live-in boyfriend or stepfather is present. "Contrary to public perception," write Patrick Fagan and Dorothy Hanks, "research shows that the most likely physical abuser of a young child will be that childs mother, not a male in the household." Mothers accounted for 55% of child murders according to a 1994 Justice Department report (and fathers for a tiny percentage). As Maggie Gallagher writes in her 1996 book, "The Abolition of Marriage": "The person most likely to abuse a child physically is a single mother. The person most likely to abuse a child sexually is the mother's boyfriend or second husband. . . . Divorce, though usually portrayed as a protection against domestic violence, is far more frequently a contributing cause." Adrienne Burgess, head of the British governments Fathers Direct program, observes that "fathers have often played the protector role inside families."
Domestic violence programs provide a gravy train of government funding that empowers the divorce industry to seize control of more children, with predictable results: more divorce, more single-mother homes, more abused children. In no other area has the current administration been so committed to continuing the failed policies of the last one.
Do we really believe that the preponderance of firefighters and police officers who died on September 11 were "batterers"? More urgently, how long do we expect our servicemen to fight and die to protect their country and families when the government of their country seems bent on destroying their families?
The writer teaches political science at Howard University.
Stephen Baskerville, PhD
Department of Political Science
Washington, DC 20059