|
|
Various bills impacting Father's Rights2003 Legislative session |
| By Mrs. Poirier of North Attleborough (by request), petition of Daniel M. Jette and another relative to abuse prevention orders. The Judiciary. |

The
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
______________________
In the Year Two Thousand
and Three.
______________________
AN ACT RELATIVE TO ABUSE PREVENTION ORDERS.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Chapter 209A of the General Laws
is hereby amended by striking out section 4 and inserting in place thereof the
following section:—
Section 4. Upon the filing of a complaint under this chapter, the court may
enter such temporary order it deems necessary to protect a plaintiff from abuse;
provided, however:
(1) the court shall determine if any previous police reports have ever been
filed by the plaintiff against the defendant or does the defendant have a
criminal record, which would suggest a violent history.
(2) The court shall determine if there are any previous medical reports where
the plaintiff has been abused by the defendant and sought medical treatment.
(3) The court shall determine if the plaintiff has any fresh cuts, bruises,
abrasions, breaks or other physical ailment that would suggest recent violence
by the defendant and cause concern of possible imminent harm to the plaintiff.
(4) The court shall ask the plaintiff if he has any witnesses that would testify
for the plaintiff against the defendant, stating that the defendant has
displayed a violent pattern against the plaintiff or others.
If none of the above 4 guidelines are found, the court shall not issue a
temporary order and the defendant shall be subpoenaed to court and allowed to
present his case to the court, affording equal representation and allowing the
court to make a fair and educated decision as to whether the order is warranted.
| By Mr. Fagan of Taunton, petition of James H. Fagan for legislation to regulate protective orders in certain court proceedings. The Judiciary. |

The
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
______________________
In the Year Two Thousand
and Three.
______________________
AN ACT FURTHER REGULATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS IN CERTAIN COURT PROCEEDINGS.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Chapter 209A of the General Laws,
as appearing in the 2000 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding at the
end thereof the following section:—
Section 11. It shall be a defense in the prosecution of any complaint alleging a
violation of the no restraint or no contact provisions of any order issued
pursuant to section three, four or five of this chapter or section eighteen or
twenty-four B of chapter 208, section thirty-two of chapter 209 or section
fifteen of chapter 209C that the protected party either initiated contact with
the defendant or invited, enticed, encouraged, consented to or otherwise
condoned the defendant’s actions which gave use to said violation.
If the court finds the protected party either initiated contact with the
defendant or invited, encouraged, consented to or otherwise encouraged the
defendant’s actions which gave rise to the alleged violation, said contact or
conduct shall be a violation of the order and shall be punishable by a fine of
not more than five thousand dollars or imprisonment for not more than two and
one-half years or both and the court may in its discretion vacate the order.
The criminal remedies provided herein are not exclusive and shall not preclude
any other available civil or criminal remedies.
| By Mr. Mariano of Quincy (by request), petition of Richard Borowicz relative to child support. The Judiciary. |

The
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
______________________
In the Year Two Thousand
and Three.
______________________
AN ACT RELATIVE TO CHILD SUPPORT.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Notwithstanding the provisions of any general or special law to the contrary, an obligor who is not allowed visitation rights shall not be required to pay child support.
visitation
| By Mr. Fallon of Malden, petition of Christopher G. Fallon, David M. Torrisi, Michael E. Festa and Arthur J. Broadhurst for legislation to preserve the best interest of minor children for out-of-state visitation rights with non-custodial parents. The Judiciary. |

The
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
______________________
In the Year Two Thousand
and Three.
______________________
AN ACT CLARIFYING THE REMOVAL STATUTE.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Section 30 of chapter 208 of the
General Laws, as appearing in the most recent edition, is hereby further amended
by inserting at the end thereof the following new paragraph:—
The removal shall be ordered only if the Court finds that the removal results in
a direct benefit to the child which outweighs any detriment to the child,
including but not limited to, that resulting from the loss of frequent and
regular visitation with the non-custodial paren